Could the Allies have bombed Auschwitz?

Photo of the Nazi extermination camp at Auschw...

An aerial photograph of Auschwitz-Birkenau, taken by the US Air Force (Image via Wikipedia)

Somebody asked me recently what I think about the debates about whether the Allies could have bombed Auschwitz, in order to prevent the mass murder of millions of people during the Second World War. Theres always been a very heated debate about the subject, quite understandably given the massive number of victims, and the tragedy that we now know the Holocaust to be.

Historical Debates tend to align into two points of view. Firstly, the ‘Abandonment of the Jews’ – that the Allies knew what was going on, that they could have bombed the death camps, but for whatever reason they chose not to. On the other hand, many historians feel that the Allies only had patchy intelligence about the exterminations; that wartime propaganda made it difficult to know what was true and what was embellished; and that the long range and the risk of killing the prisoners in particular made it impossible to do anything.

The strategic situation in 1943-4

Whilst draconian measures against the Jews in German occupied Europe had begun as soon as the Nazis came to power in 1933 (the 1934 Nuremberg laws, Reichkristallnacht in 1938, the ghettos in the East), it was in 1943 and 1944 that the ‘Final Solution‘ – the extermination of the Jews – was put into action. In particular, 1944 saw the extermination of the large population of Jews from Hungary.

By 1943 and 1944, the Western Allies had received enough intelligence to know that mass murder was taking place in occupied Europe. Reports had reached Britain and the US from prisoners who had escaped from Auschwitz, particularly the Vrba-Wetzler report which surfaced in 1944. Earlier in the war Britain had received intelligence from Polish sources, and later in the war Auachwitz was inadvertantly photographed by the US Air Force, although analysts failed to realise the sites significance. There was no doubt that seriously unpleasant events were taking place in eastern Poland, the only arguments seem to have been focussed on the number of victims, where they were taking place, and what if anything could be done about them.

The Death Camps

One problem with our understanding of the Holocaust is that for many people, Auschwitz IS the Holocaust. Over a million people are estimated to have been killed there, but millions of people died in other extermination camps elsewhere in Poland – Sobibor, Chelmno, Madjanek, Belzec and Treblinka for example. But in the debate about Bombing Auschwitz, these camps are always overlooked. The Holocaust was taking place on such a wide scale, with a thorough administration, stretching back to the SS and the Reich Main Security Office in Berlin, and with people such as Heydrich, Eichmann and Kaltenbrunner involved. Simply bombing one camp would not have ended the whole programme of murder: persecution of the Jews was a fundamental tenet of Hitler and the Nazi party, it would have been akin to chopping one tentacle off a squid. Given the lengths the Nazis were willing to go to, and the complexity of the mass murder machine, the only way the Holocaust could be totally stopped would be to defeat Nazi Germany once and for all.

The problem of precision Bombing at long range

We also need to bear in mind the problems of bombing such a precise target. We assume that the RAF would have been able to drop bombs on a sixpence, neatly destroying the administration block, the gas chambers, and the railways lines, without harming any of the inmates. Cruise missiles with GPS and laser guiding might be able to achieve that level of accuracy, but in 1943 and 1944, the picture was somewhat different. The RAF and USAAF were bombing Germany by night and day throughout 1943 and 1944, but suffering huge losses in aircraft and crews in the process. Even with advances such as GEE, Oboe, H2S, and pathfinding tactics, the only way that the Air Forces could seriously damage targets was to area bomb them – to drop huge amounts of explosives and incendiaries over a wide area. This was clearly a tactic that could not be used against Auschwitz or any other camps, as it would have resulted in the deaths of thousands of prisoners, and might not have been sure to succeed in any case. Some precision bombing raids did take place in the war – the Dambusters raid on the Ruhr Dams, for example. However this involved a Squadron spending much time and resources working on a specficially designed bomb, with countless hours of scientific research and special navigational aids. And although the raid succeeded, it suffered high losses.

If it was not possible to bomb the camp itself, might it have been possible to bomb the railway lines going into the camp? Railways lines were a very difficult target to hit – being extremely narrow, even more so from 10,000 feet up. It would have taken an awful lot of planes, dropping many bombs, to give a good chance of destroying the railway lines. But even then, railways lines were relatively easy to repair – they consist pretty much of aggregate stone, sleepers and the track itself. Even if the line was hit and cratered, it would take little time for the Germans to make slave labourers fill in the craters and re-lay the lines.

Auschwitz was at the very extreme limit of the range of Bombers such as the Lancaster and the Flying Fortress, flying from Britain. The bombers were not able to fly from anywhere in liberated Europe until virtually the end of the war, although some bases in southern Italy were available, these were at about the same range. Whilst it would have been possible to fly Bombing missions of that range - the US Air Force did carry out a few small raids on industrial targets in Southern Poland - it was at the very extreme range of what was possible. Flying to Bomb Auschwitz would have entailed an extremely long flight across Germany itself, and – in all likelihood – massive losses from flak and nightfighters. The distance might have limited the bombload that could have been carried. And we should not underestimate the challenge of bombing accurately after such a long flight.

The long range might have not been such a problem, had British and American aircraft been able to land in Soviet occupied territory to refuel. However, the Soviet authorities were not keen to allow the western allies to do so. When the British and Americans wanted to land planes in soviet-held territory in order to drop supplies to the Polish Resistance during the uprising in August 1944, Stalin refused to help until it was too late.

There have also been suggestions that Britain and the US could have dropped the 1st Polish Parachute Brigade on the camp. This would have entailed a flight of the same distances of a bombing raid, in C-47 Dakota’s with less range, which were also unarmed and unarmoured. The lightly armed Polish Paras would have been hundreds of miles behind enemy lines, and would have had to fight a well prepared SS Guard, who probably numbered the same as them, with the ability to call in reinforcements quickly. They might even have liquidated the prisoners more quickly. In any case, even if the Polish Parachute Brigade had landed and liberated the camp, what then? Auschwitz was almost certainly going to be liberated by the Red Army, who were not happy for the British-supported Parachute Brigade to be used anywhere in their sphere of influence.

The Soviets

Whilst the British and Americans might be seen to have had the means to take action over Auschwitz, the Soviet Union was fighting on the Eastern Front, and was much closer to liberating Auschwitz. In February 1945, it was soldiers of the Red Army who discovered the camp, it having been abandoned by its SS Guards. They also liberated the other extermination camps in the East. But the Russians possessed a negligible Air Force compared to Britain and the United States.

Although Bombing might be able to impact upon the enemy, the only way to completely end the atrocities of the Holocaust was to defeat the Nazis, liberate occupied Europe and Germany itself – only by doing so could the mass-murders really be stopped. Anything else could only have a short-term effect, and as we have seen, even as the Third Reich was collapsing, the Nazis were still determined to exterminate the Jews.

Neither should we forget that the Soviet Union under Stalin was capable of committing some terrible crimes. With the Great Purges, the liquidation of the Kukaks and the massacre of Polish Officers at Katyn, it has been argued by some historians that Stalin is ultimately responsible for more crimes than Hitler was. This is an important point to consider. Whilst some might feel that the western allies did not do enough, all the evidence suggests that Stalin and his subordinates, if they knew about the Holocaust, in all probability did not see it as a priority to stop it. Such was the disregard for human life that Stalin had. Indeed, when photographs appeared of what the Red Army had found, many refused to believe it, seeing it as Communist anti-Nazi propaganda.

Final Thoughts

This is such an emotive, and, difficult subject to write about. No matter what conclusion you come to, you are bound to upset somebody. But on the balance of history and evidence, for that is what we must deal with, I do not think the Western Allies could have done much to prevent the Holocaust by bombing the camps. I feel that the possiblity was looked into, but rightly the planners concluded that it was just not possible to enact. Winston Churchill, a long-time supporter of Jewish groups, even at one time ordered the RAF to look into launching a bombing raid, offering his own personal influence if others tried to prevent it. But Churchill himself accepted the problems that his officers had come up against. I believe that any historian would want the allies to have been able to do something, and would want them to have done it. But it just could not be done. Of course, now it would be impossible, with high-tech sattelite observation, for such genocide to take place on such a scale unhindred, and with precisiom bombing and advanced special forces, we have more options for prevention.

I don’t think the myth of an allied abandonment of the Jews holds water. The Jewish lobby had great influence in both Britain and the US before, during and after the war. Britain had been the main instigator, via the Balfour decleration, of the call for a Jewish homeland. British forces liberated Belsen, and US forces liberated Dachau, and both camps saw considerable disaster relief efforts. If the western allies were guilty of anything regarding the holocaust, it is of not doing enough when they had the chance, prior to 1939 when all the signs were there that the persecution of the Jews was not going to stop and was likely to get worse. More effort to help Jews escape mainland Europe would have lessened the number who ended up in the death camps. Or, better still, standing up to Hitler in the first place might have prevented him having the opportinity to commit mass murder.

About these ads

16 Comments

Filed under debate, Holocaust, Uncategorized, World War Two

16 responses to “Could the Allies have bombed Auschwitz?

  1. Hi all,
    Thisis my first comment, & as I’ve only been following you for about 2 weeks, I’m trying, from an EX-member of HM Royal Navy,I just thought that I would add to this Very Delicate subject, & this is ……

    The Death Camps, Were-Are- & Forever will be a place of such a Massive scale of Human Life, wasted by or Ordered by a Man (I shall use lightly) of Demented, & Psychotic Mind. A Man who thought that he could create a Master Race, yet took his own life in what can only ever be, a Cowards way out.. Not very good breeding for a Master Race to follow. A Man who, I know Very little about, but enough to know that, no amount of Pain, one would like to inflict on him, is Ever going to be enough, to ALL those that died under his Reign.
    To Bomb the Death Camps, as they were called, would have killed many Men Women & Children, & maybe a relife, to know that they will die, a Quicker & less-painless way of dying. The only hope that if it did happen, that it might take out the Horror of the Man in question. That too, would have been a “Get-out” clause for the man they call Hitler. A double edged Sword, as he was in a Win/Win situation.
    The only Good thing to come out of this, & as time goes by, it is leading to ALL the dictators, being removed from there Own power…We all know who they are, & we all want them removed, but only a few will go in fighting,& the piece’s of wealth picked up, by the ones that didn’t go in to end the plight of these Men, little men with Big ego’s, why?? because there lacking in other parts of there lives…
    Come the day, When these will all be gone, & the world….. Well maybe a safer place, a better place, but I’m afraid, it wont happen in my lifetime, & I’m only 44yrs old.
    God Help Us All.

  2. great points altogether, you just received a brand new reader.
    What might you recommend in regards to your submit
    that you made some days ago? Any certain?

  3. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering
    if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates.
    I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and
    was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like
    this. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look
    forward to your new updates.

  4. I blog frequently and I rreally appreciate yiur content.
    This great article has really peaked my interest. I’m
    going to bookmark your blog and ksep checking for new information about once a week.
    I subscribed to your RSS feed as well.

  5. Hey there! I understand this is sort of off-topic however I
    had to ask. Does operating a well-established blog such as
    yours require a lot of work? I am completely new to operating a blog
    however I do write in my journal everyday. I’d like to start
    a blog so I can share my own experience and views
    online. Please let me know if you have any kind of suggestions or tips
    for new aspiring blog owners. Appreciate it!

  6. Since all cars require maintenance and repairing from time to
    car gps tracker time – particularly in the summer, after all, buying a car.
    While the retail priice is car gps tracker the price.
    Elmhurst used car buyers. When purchasing a car
    gps tracker previously owned vehicle, what steps should you take?
    Many car donation centers spread in almost every imaginable condition.
    Our Used Car Search section will ensure that you if do
    buy a car in the US. If you have a test drive.

  7. This is a position that I’m sure he (or anyone else) does enjoy playing
    in real-life. This will help make sure that nobody can
    steal your idea and claim it is their particular.

  8. It is an all-natural sweetener that has aone-of-a-kind quality much like caramel, molasses, or maple syrup.
    This bottle has pure yacon that’s minimally-processed with no
    usage of artificial colorings, flavors, preservatives, or preservatives.
    They certainly were requested not to alter
    some other part of their program, just and never to diet or do any extra workout allow
    Yacon perform its magic. Except taken as directed yacon syrup does not have
    any known unwanted side effects. Here is the cause the Peruans and Brazilians have used it combat digestive problems and Diabetes.
    Being a health enthusiastTM

    Articles & ReferenceHealth ConditionsHerbal RemediesHomeopathyMen
    FitnessSupplement & ‘s HealthSports GuideWeight Management Women’s HealthView All >

    RecipesRecipe diets & SearchWhich Diet for You?View All >

    FREE SHIPPING on orders of $25 or even more.
    buy yacon history of maple syrup in canada
    Moreover, a slow-metabolism will automatically result
    in a rapidly discharge of the glucose while in the
    system, that’ll predispose you to fat storage about other blood
    vessels, high cholesterol levels, etc. What’s this as well as
    the surfaces of arteries? Add 1/2 tsp. The ladies were divided in to
    two teams… 40 women got Yacon syrup, while fifteen girls got another kind
    of syrup without any active ingredients (placebo).
    I’s safe to convey the syrup does work, but
    much like any health supplement, specific experiences are
    very different and you should carefully ponder the benefits of using the syrup before you decide to get it.

    This origin is a huge natural part of the
    Andean diet for generation after creation.
    Find Out!! Yacon is a sort of origin found in South America,
    that has been a diet for your inhabitants there
    for hundreds of years. I’ll try 30 before. These bacteria also transform FOS to small-chain EFAS stopping cholesterol
    synthesis inside the liver while increasing structure tenderness
    to insulin and managing insulin levels.

    An all-natural source of fiber and antioxidants.

    Breaking News-Yacon Syrup, the Newest Natural Fat Loss Experiencing
    where can you buy yacon syrup
    “If Yacon Syrup Could Be The Magic Bullet for fat loss Figure Out!”

  9. Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice at the same time as you amend your
    web site, how can i subscribe for a weblog site? The account aided me a applicable deal.

    I have been tiny bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered brilliant clear idea

  10. The choice of plants you are going to feature in the landscape is one important thing you need to
    focus on. These days, no one works for cheap, and so even basic
    landscaping is likely to cost home owners a bomb.
    Backyard landscaping is a wonderful art that attracts lots of aesthetic values.

  11. In Cyndia sources, next step is to add repo.bingner.com.

    Yet you provided them an US handle or perhaps
    a PO Box address in the US. You can even put it to use to open the iPad
    and the iPod Hint.

  12. Hurrah, that’s what I was seeking for, what a information! existing here at this
    blog, thanks admin of this site.

  13. Easily add and change your contacts stored in the Contact Management database.
    It offers a wide range of options to play about with the pictures on your telephone.

    You don’t believe it can get any better, but it can.

  14. This is a lot compared to the currently laughable 720p video recording
    to the iPad 2. Apple has were able to develop a big market for
    a device that many people don’t actually need.

  15. Choosing one of these brilliant two kinds of window
    treatments has typically got to do more with design. They demand less
    maintenance, which explains why they are a popular choice among
    people.

  16. I got this site from my pal who informed me regarding this web site and at the moment this time
    I am browsing this website and reading very informative
    artticles at ths time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s